Download A Penchant for Prejudice: Unraveling Bias in Judicial by Linda Gayle Mills PDF

By Linda Gayle Mills

A Penchant for Prejudice combines a close empirical examine of the decision-making practices of judges with a cosmopolitan theoretical argument which exposes modern myths approximately judging and indicates equipment of incorporating the inevitable bias that's detected during this and different stories. in response to a different examine of the choices of Social safeguard judges, the e-book demanding situations the that means of judicial impartiality. Linda G. turbines unearths that, in perform, bias is a constant size of what's thought of "impartial" decision-making. the implications exhibit that impartiality because the felony procedure now defines it, is itself a kind of bias, and traditionally and contextually delicate definition of bias, one that takes account of the groups and cultures that turn out to be judged within the felony approach, needs to conquer the trendy dualistic proposal of imparitality because the exclusion of bias with a view to reply to wishes of the range of candidates and the judges who adjudicate their claims. in line with turbines, the judicial bias she came across mirrored in her research turns out not just to essentialize and stereotype candidates but additionally prevents judges from enticing weak claimants in a manner that the felony procedure certainly demands.A Penchant for Prejudice could be of curiosity to scholars and students of legislations, judicial decisionmaking, and discrimination.Linda G. turbines is Assistant Professor of Social Welfare and legislation, collage of California, l. a..

Show description

Read or Download A Penchant for Prejudice: Unraveling Bias in Judicial Decision-Making PDF

Best legal theory & systems books

Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial Review

''With willing perception into the typical legislations brain, Edlin argues that there are wealthy assets in the legislations for judges to flooring their competition to morally outrageous legislation, and a criminal legal responsibility on them to overturn it, consequent at the normal universal legislations legal responsibility to boost the legislations. therefore, heavily unjust legislation pose for universal legislation judges a hindrance in the legislation, not only an ethical problem to the legislations, a clash of tasks, not only a predicament of moral sense.

Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and Representation of Law

Jurisdiction in Deleuze: The Expression and illustration of legislation explores an affinity among the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and jurisprudence as a convention of technical felony idea. the writer addresses and reopens a important aesthetic challenge in jurisprudence: the adaptation among the expression and the illustration of legislation.

Born Free and Equal?: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of Discrimination

What's discrimination? there are particular circumstances of differential therapy that just about an individual could describe as discriminatory; but upon deeper exam, this near-unanimity offers method to confrontation and distinction. for example, is it discrimination whilst hospitals lease non-smokers basically? not just do humans range on which circumstances of differential remedy they see as discriminatory, additionally they disagree approximately whilst discrimination is morally flawed; what makes it morally improper; and, certainly, approximately even if all kinds of discrimination are morally unsuitable!

Extra info for A Penchant for Prejudice: Unraveling Bias in Judicial Decision-Making

Example text

Unlike CEs, DDS physicians have no direct contact with the applicant. qxd 7/20/99 2:35 PM 30 Page 30 A Penchant for Prejudice interpreting medical evidence at the hearing. The MEs never examine the claimant but make their assessments based on their review of the medical records and their impressions of the claimant’s testimony at the hearing. R. 1527 (f) (2)). In sum, physicians help satisfy the requirement that disabling conditions be veri‹ed by “objective” medical evidence. This mechanism, therefore, assumes both that medical evidence is objective and that the people generating that evidence are unbiased in the methods applied when ordering and evaluating clinical tests.

House 1994, 57). S. House 1994, 57). More recently, Social Security has attempted to improve and streamline the application process. The SSA’s “Reengineering” or “Disability Redesign” Plan proposes to reduce the length of the application procedure in half and to make decisions between adjudicators more consistent (GAO 1997; NOSSCR 1998). 2 Some minor changes, however, have already been detected. 4 million applications were received, with a denial rate of 69 percent, compared to the 60 percent rate 3 years earlier.

The “Grid” The medical-vocational guidelines, commonly referred to as the “Grid,” are a standardized set of rules from the Code of Federal Regulations that are laid out in grid format. These factors become relevant in a disability claim when an applicant’s condition does not meet or equal the listings. R. 404, subpt. P, app. 2). In cases in which an impairment restricts an applicant’s physical capabilities, disability adjudicators rely on the Grid roughly as follows. Adjudicators take into account the applicants’ remaining physical capabilities—that is, their “residual functional capacity,” along with other factors including age, education, and previous work experience—and refer to the Grid for a standardized determination of what employment possibilities still exist.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 48 votes